Spencer Loomis Elementary School

Spencer Loomis Elementary School had 438 students enrolled in grades K 1 2 3 4 5 . There were 6,288 in Lake Zurich CUSD 95 and 2,070,125 in all state public schools.

This school's Sun-Times rank is  344 among 2205 ranked elementary schools. The rankings are based on the average reading and math scores. How we ranked the schools.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, all public schools must have 100 percent of tested students meet state standards in reading and math by 2014. In the interim, states must set gradually increasing targets. This year in Illinois, a school is deemed to be making Adequate Yearly Progress if it meeds the following conditions:

  • At least 95 percent tested in reading and mathematics for every student group.
  • At least 70 percent of all tested students must meet or exceed state standards on the reading and math tests.
  • A subgroup that falls below 70 percent can claim “safe harbor” from failing adequate yearly progress if its percent of kids meeting or exceeding state standards improves by 10 percent from the previous year.
  • High schools must have a graduation rate of at least 78 percent.
  • Elementary, junior high and middle schools must have an attendance rate of at least 90 percent.
  • Click here for complete AYP guidelines.

This school has met all of the requirements for adequate yearly progress.

All State Tests: Composite Performance for All Grades

% of students who meet or exceed state goals
  School District State
2007-2008 95.3% 88.6% 74.8%
2008-2009 91.6% 88.2% 75.5%

ISAT Scores

State goals for the Illinois Standards Achievement Tests were established with the help of state elementary teachers. Academic warning refers to the percentage of students whose work on ISAT tests shows an inconsistent command of the basic knowledge and skills.

Overall Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) Performance

% of students who meet or exceed state goals
  School District State
2007-2008 95.7% 92.4% 79.1%
2008-2009 91.9% 92.1% 79.8%

Third Grade

Reading
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
  School District State
  Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total
All Students 57.0% 34.2% 91.2% 48.0% 40.6% 88.6% 46.2% 26.0% 72.2%
Boys 66.7% 22.2% 88.9% 51.9% 33.9% 85.8% 45.4% 23.2% 68.6%
Girls 48.8% 44.2% 93.0% 43.8% 47.9% 91.7% 47.0% 28.9% 75.9%
% of students who are on academic warning
  School District State
All Students 0.0% 1.5% 4.7%
Boys 0.0% 2.5% 6.0%
Girls 0.0% 0.5% 3.3%
Math
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
  School District State
  Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total
All Students 28.8% 65.0% 93.8% 33.3% 62.8% 96.1% 44.2% 41.0% 85.2%
Boys 30.6% 63.9% 94.5% 32.1% 62.9% 95.0% 42.4% 42.6% 85.0%
Girls 27.3% 65.9% 93.2% 34.5% 62.7% 97.2% 46.0% 39.4% 85.4%
% of students who are on academic warning
  School District State
All Students 2.5% 1.7% 3.3%
Boys 0.0% 2.1% 3.7%
Girls 4.5% 1.4% 3.0%

Fourth Grade

Reading
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
  School District State
  Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total
All Students 51.1% 38.0% 89.1% 45.5% 43.7% 89.2% 45.9% 27.9% 73.8%
Boys 53.7% 37.0% 90.7% 47.3% 40.2% 87.5% 44.9% 25.4% 70.3%
Girls 47.4% 39.5% 86.9% 43.4% 47.8% 91.2% 47.0% 30.4% 77.4%
% of students who are on academic warning
  School District State
All Students 0.0% 0.2% 1.4%
Boys 0.0% 0.4% 1.8%
Girls 0.0% 0.0% 0.9%
Math
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
  School District State
  Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total
All Students 48.9% 45.7% 94.6% 47.3% 48.9% 96.2% 58.2% 27.6% 85.8%
Boys 46.3% 50.0% 96.3% 47.0% 49.6% 96.6% 56.5% 28.5% 85.0%
Girls 52.6% 39.5% 92.1% 47.6% 48.0% 95.6% 59.9% 26.6% 86.5%
% of students who are on academic warning
  School District State
All Students 0.0% 0.0% 1.1%
Boys 0.0% 0.0% 1.4%
Girls 0.0% 0.0% 0.9%
Science
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
  School District State
  Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total
All Students 60.9% 31.5% 92.4% 59.2% 34.3% 93.5% 59.2% 17.6% 76.8%
Boys 63.0% 31.5% 94.5% 53.8% 39.8% 93.6% 57.0% 19.6% 76.6%
Girls 57.9% 31.6% 89.5% 65.5% 27.9% 93.4% 61.5% 15.6% 77.1%
% of students who are on academic warning
  School District State
All Students 0.0% 0.0% 3.1%
Boys 0.0% 0.0% 3.4%
Girls 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%

Fifth Grade

Reading
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
  School District State
  Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total
All Students 59.0% 26.9% 85.9% 46.0% 43.5% 89.5% 47.6% 25.9% 73.5%
Boys 67.4% 18.6% 86.0% 49.1% 38.4% 87.5% 46.5% 23.7% 70.2%
Girls 48.6% 37.1% 85.7% 42.9% 48.8% 91.7% 48.8% 28.3% 77.1%
% of students who are on academic warning
  School District State
All Students 0.0% 0.2% 0.4%
Boys 0.0% 0.4% 0.6%
Girls 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%
Math
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
  School District State
  Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total Meets Exceeds Total
All Students 61.5% 34.6% 96.1% 62.4% 32.4% 94.8% 66.2% 16.3% 82.5%
Boys 60.5% 34.9% 95.4% 62.1% 32.1% 94.2% 64.2% 17.1% 81.3%
Girls 62.9% 34.3% 97.2% 62.8% 32.6% 95.4% 68.2% 15.4% 83.6%
% of students who are on academic warning
  School District State
All Students 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%
Boys 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%
Girls 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Students

Mobility rate is based on the number of students who enroll in or leave a school during the school year. Students may be counted more than once. Chronic truants were absent without valid cause for 18 or more of the last 180 school days.

Racial/Ethnic Background

  School District State
Total Enrollment 438 6,288 2,070,125
White Enrollment 81.3% 85.1% 53.3%
Black Enrollment 0.2% 0.8% 19.1%
Hispanic Enrollment 5.7% 6.3% 20.8%
Asian Enrollment 10.3% 5.8% 4.1%
Native American Enrollment 0.0% 0.1% 0.2%
Multi-Racial Enrollment 2.5% 2.0% 2.5%

Student Characteristics

  School District State
Attendance Rate 96.0% 95.1% 93.7%
Limited-English Proficiency 3.9% 2.3% 8.0%
Low Income 3.2% 6.4% 42.9%
Mobility Rate 1.8% 3.7% 13.5%
No. of Chronic Truants 0 11 73,245
Chronic Truancy Rate 0.0% 0.2% 3.7%
Dropout Rate % % %

Average Class Size

  School District State
Kindergarten 18.7 16.7 20.5
First Grade 20.0 19.7 20.9
Second Grade 22.3 21.9 21.3
Third Grade 27.0 23.1 21.8
Fourth Grade 23.0 24.6 22.2
Fifth Grade 27.0 23.3 22.6

District Teachers

Lake Zurich CUSD 95 employed 419 of the state’s 133,017 teachers. Numbers are for the entire district and are not available by individual school, except for the percentage of teachers with emergency or provisional creditials and the percentage of classes not taught by teachers deemed “highly qualified.”

Racial/Ethnic Background

  District State
Total Teachers 419 133,017
Female Teachers 76.0% 77.1%
Male Teachers 24.0% 22.9%
White Teachers 98.3% 85.1%
Black Teachers 0.0% 8.3%
Hispanic Teachers 0.7% 5.0%
Asian Teachers 1.0% 1.4%
Native American Teachers 0.0% 0.2%

Pupil-to-Teacher/Administrator Ratios

  District State
Pupil-Teacher Ratio (Elementary) 16.4 18.4
Pupil-Teacher Ratio (High School) 18.6 18.0
Pupil-Administrator Ratio 208.6 201.8
Pupil-Certified Staff Ratio 12.3 13.3

Teacher Education/Experience

  District State
Average Teaching Experience (yrs.) 12.0 12.5
Teachers with B.A. 26.2% 44.1%
Teachers with M.A.+ 73.8% 55.8%

Teacher Credentials/Parental Contact

  School District State
Teachers with Emergency or Provisional Credentials 0.0% 0.0% 0.6%
Classes Not Taught by “Highly Qualified” Teachers 0.0% 0.0% 1.2%
Parental Contact 100.0% 99.5% 96.7%

Parental contact includes parent-teacher conferences, parental visits to school, school visits to home, telephone conversations, and written correspondence.

District Finances

Numbers are for the entire district and are not available by individual school.

Due to the way Illinois school districts are configured, state averages for equalized assessed valuation per pupil and total school tax rate per $100 are not provided.

EAV (Equalized assessed valuation) includes all computed property values upon which a district's local tax rate is calculated.

Total school tax rate is a district’s total tax rate as it appears on local property tax bills.

Instructional expenditure per pupil includes the direct costs of teaching pupils or the interaction between teachers and pupils.

Operating expenditure per pupil includes the gross operating cost of a school district excluding summer school, adult education, bond principal retired, and capital expenditures.

Financial Indicators (2008-2009)

  District State Similar
Type
Similar
Size
Average Teacher Salary $66,752 $61,402 $59,499 $62,489
Average Administrator Salary $95,146 $106,217 $100,856 $104,037
Instructional Exp. Per Pupil $5,959 $6,103 $5,921 $6,130
Operating Exp. Per Pupil $10,179 $10,417 $10,006 $10,343
2007 EAV per Pupil $257,706   $148,827 $161,875
2007 School Tax Rate per $100 3.99   3.75 3.66

Fund Expenditures (2008-2009)

  District % of Dist.
Budget
State Avg.
% of Budget
Education $52,372,825 67.8% 71.5%
Operations & Mainenance $6,570,739 8.5% 8.6%
Transportation $7,596,114 9.8% 3.9%
Bond & Interest $7,050,169 9.1% 6.3%
Rent $0 0.0% 0.0%
Municipal Retirement/Social Security $1,341,090 1.7% 1.8%
Fire Prevention & Safety $0 0.0% 0.9%
Site & Construction $2,315,007 3.0% 6.8%
Total $77,245,944  

Revenue by Source

Numbers are for the entire district and are not available by individual school.

  District District % State %
Local Property Taxes $63,405,355 83.5% 58.7%
Other Local Funding $4,744,277 6.2% 6.3%
General State Aid $2,404,452 3.2% 18.6%
Other State Funding $4,830,985 6.4% 9.0%
Federal Funding $587,209 0.8% 7.4%
Total Revenues $75,972,278  

Expenditure by Function 2008-2009 (Percentages)

Numbers are for the entire district and are not available by individual school.

  District District % State %
Instruction $35,794,172 46.3% 46.7%
General Administration $1,350,376 1.7% 2.4%
Supporting Services $23,177,407 30.0% 32.7%
Other Expenditures $16,923,989 21.9% 18.2%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Guidelines

Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, all public schools must have 100 percent of their tested students meet state standards in (making Adequate Yearly Progress in) reading and math by 2014. In the interim, states must set gradually increasing targets to ensure that goal will be met. This year in Illinois, a school is deemed to be making adequate yearly progress if it meets all of the following conditions:

  1. At least 95 percent tested in reading and mathematics for every student group. If the current year participation rate is less than 95 percent, this condition may be met if the average of the current and preceding year rates is at least 95 percent, or if the average of the current and two preceding years is at least 95 percent. Only actual participation rates are printed. If the participation rate printed is less than 95 percent and yet this school makes AYP, it means that the 95 percent condition was met by averaging.
  2. At least 70.0 percent meeting/exceeding standards in reading and mathematics for every group. For any group with less than 70.0 percent meeting/exceeding standards, a 95 percent confidence interval was applied. Subgroups may meet this condition through Safe Harbor provisions. ***
  3. For schools not making AYP solely because the IEP group fails to have 70.0 percent meeting/exceeding standards, 14 percent may be added to this variable in accordance with the federal 2 percent flexibility provision.
  4. At least 90 percent attendance rate for non-high schools and at least 78 percent graduation rate for high schools.

* Includes only students enrolled as of 05/01/2009.

** Safe Harbor Targets of 70.0 percent or above are not printed.

*** Subgroups with fewer than 45 students are not reported. Safe Harbor only applies to subgroups of 45 or more. In order for Safe Harbor to apply, a subgroup must decrease by 10 percent the percentage of scores that did not meet state standards from the previous year plus meet the other indicators (attendance rate for non-high schools and graduation rate for high schools) for the subgroup. For subgroups that do not meet their Safe Harbor Targets, a 75 percent confidence interval is applied. Safe Harbor allows schools an alternate method to meet subgroup minimum targets on achievement.